Frequently Asked Questions
It should be noted that the Sheriff considered the Supreme Court’s Judgment in ParkingEye v Beavis  UKSC 67 and commented that:
“The charges are nothing more than a legitimate mechanism to create a potential revenue stream to meet costs that would otherwise be borne by the proprietors themselves and without which those services were unlikely to be viable. The Supreme Court touched on this in the “Parking Eye” case ( ParkingEye Limited (Respondent) v Beavis (Appellant) UKSC 2015/0116 ) where Lords Neuberger and Sumption referred to the objectives of owners protecting parking amenity and funding it through user charges thus: “These two objectives appear to us to be perfectly reasonable in themselves”. I respectfully agree.”
Please note: the / character within your reference should be substituted with the * button when using our payment line.
*Please note, The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 is only applicable to Parking Charges issued in England & Wales.
Please click here to pay or alternatively write to: PO Box 565, Chorley, PR6 6HT